← Resources

Contradiction detection: keeping both numbers instead of averaging them

2026-08-08 · 6 min read

Breaking news is the worst case for a summarizer. Counts move, sources lag, and a model that blends them produces a number that no source ever reported.

That blended number is the most dangerous output in AI: it looks sourced and it is invented.

The rule

Competing values are never averaged, rounded together, silently overwritten by the newest one, or quietly picked between. Each is kept verbatim, attributed, and shown next to the reason the figures differ — cut-off time, counting method, scope, definition, sample.

Casualty counts, vote tallies, financial figures and polling numbers are treated as hard contradictions on any disagreement, not noise to be smoothed.

Verified claim cardOutput format · not a captured run

Question

How many people died in the incident reported this morning?

Answer

Two counts are live and they don't reconcile yet. Both are shown as reported; neither is averaged.

62/100

Straight Edge score · Partial support

Multiple sources of similar rank disagree; capped while unresolved.

Contradiction logged · unresolved

Reported death toll

Wire agency A

6 dead

police briefing, 09:40 local

Wire agency B

9 dead

hospital count, 14:10 local

Different cut-off times and different counting bodies: a scene count versus a hospital intake count.

Would change this answer: An official consolidated figure from the responsible authority.

Why the log matters after the fact

The contradiction entry stays in the exported trace. Months later you can see not just what was believed, but what was contested and why — which is the part every other tool throws away.

Share the receiptPost on XRedditLinkedIn

Ask it something it could get wrong

Three questions, no card, no account. Every answer comes back with its score, its sources and an exportable trace.

Ask 3 questions free

Founding member · $9.99/mo billed yearly · first 100 members